Where exercise, income, and life expectancy are linked

Our built environments can dramatically decrease opportunities for healthy living, producing persistent inequalities

Jeremy Ney
9 min readApr 24, 2024

Sign up to get exclusive stories like this one to better understand the hidden side of inequality in America — join here

Exercise isn’t just important for your New Years’ resolution; it may be the difference between life and death. 72% of Americans do not get enough exercise for a healthy lifestyle according to the CDC, but depending on your income and where you live, these numbers are dramatically different.

Life expectancy and inequality is a hugely important topic for us here. We’ve written about it continuously over the years, and in many ways it may be one of the most serious inequalities out there. This piece helps explain some of the underlying factors that contributes to America’s life expectancy divide, which is at one of its worse places in decades as I recently covered in TIME Magazine.

According to the CDC, physical inactivity contributes to 1 in 10 premature deaths in the US. Inadequate levels of physical activity are associated with $117 billion in annual healthcare costs. This loss of life disproportionately impacts low-income Americans who typically lack access to sports, exercise, and nearby parks.

70% of children from families with incomes above $100,000 participated in sports in 2020. But for families living below the poverty line, the sports participation rate was less than half that at 31%.

This trend is only getting worse. Recent Aspen Institute research found that participation in a healthy level of physical activity for families making less than $25,000 decreased from 34.1% in 2013 to 26.6% in 2021. But for families making more than $100,000 the trend was the exact opposite — physical activity increased over that period from 43.9% to 46%. This increase is even more notable since that range includes the first two years of the pandemic.

In our analysis, we found a 70% correlation between the number of physically unhealthy days and median household income. Hispanic Americans had the highest prevalence of physical inactivity at 31.7%, followed by Black Americans at 30.3%. Physical inactivity for White Americans was far lower at 23.4%.

Inequality in life expectancy from physical activity

Doing a moderate-intensity workout for 3–5 hours per week can reduce the risk of early death by 21%. Doubling that amount of time can decrease your chance or early death by 31%. In other words, beginning moderate exercise in one’s 30’s can increase life expectancy by 7 years.

The CDC estimates that 8.3% of deaths every year can be attributed to a lack of sufficient physical activity throughout one’s life. This prevalence was highest for adults aged 40–69. Similarly, being sedentary for at least 9.5 hours per day was also associated with higher risk of mortality earlier in life.

While getting 10,000 steps per day has certainly become much more popular, the general idea that people need to move to stay healthy is deeply important. A recent groundbreaking study has found that 4,000 steps can meaningfully improve one’s life expectancy and that mortality risk decreased by 15% with every additional 1,000 steps participants took. However, if you live in a neighborhood with no sidewalks or few parks, this can be very challenging.

A product of our built environment

The #1 factor contributing to physical inactivity is our built environment — streets, parks, buildings, sidewalks, and trails. Low-income neighborhoods are far less likely to have parks. In NYC for example, low-income neighborhoods have 21% less park space than their higher income counterparts. This holds true across the country.

Children get their physical activity largely from sports and gym class in school. However, Black children begin playing youth sports at age 8, a year later on average than their White peers. Overall, 100 million Americans, including 27 million children, live without access to a park close to home. But even simpler solutions like sidewalks can also make a meaningful contribution towards physical health. Several studies have found that sidewalk access alone is associated with higher rates of physical activity and lower risks of childhood obesity, not to mention providing children with safer routes to schools.

Public parks in majority Black neighborhoods are half the size and almost 5x as crowded, according to new research by the Trust for Public Land. The study of 14,000 towns and cities around America found that parks serving majority low-income households are on average four times smaller and four times more crowded than parks that serve mostly high-income households.

Spending cuts at public schools is another strongly contributing factor for limiting physical activities, particularly in public schools in lower income neighborhoods. Data from Massachusetts public, charter, and parochial high schools across the state shows that in the state’s 10 poorest communities, sports participation is 43% below the Massachusetts statewide average.

This isn’t only bad for health outcomes, it can also be demoralizing. In Connecticut over the past 10 years, teams from the state’s 5 wealthiest towns garnered 159 championships across all sports, while those teams from the state’s 5 poorest towns and cities combined for just 44.

Did you enjoy your little league team? Children living in low-income households are 6x more likely to quit sports due to costs. Tyriq, a sixth-grader at Schaumburg Elementary — a charter school on the east end of New Orleans — loved his neighborhood basketball team. But his mother couldn’t afford the cost of new shoes and jerseys, and Tyriq knew it was putting a strain on the family and decided to quit.

Impact for women: sports, health, and beyond

Jamie Mittleman, the founder of Flame Bearers, has this to say about the inequalities that still persist for women in sports and exercise.

While TITLE IX was supposed to level the playing field for women and girls, there’s still a long way to go. Female participation in sports has increased 12x from 1971 to 2019, but now only matches what male participation in sports was in 1972. Male participation in sports in 1971 was roughly 3.6M; while female participation in sports in 2019 is 3.4M, with more than 1M more boys participating in sports than girls. This effectively means that girls were 50 years behind boys in terms of sports participation.

Inequities in sports are not evenly distributed across race, class, and geography. Girls of color, girls from lower socioeconomic communities, and girls in both urban and rural backgrounds participate less and drop out more than their white, more affluent, suburban counterparts, further compounding missed benefits. Specifically, girls of color in urban and rural centers drop out of sports at 2x the rate suburban white girls.

Lack of sports opportunities are a proxy for forgone health, social/emotional, and leadership benefits. In general, girls who play sports experience lower levels of depression and obesity, have higher levels of confidence, more positive views of body image, and cite significant leadership takeaways. According to an Ernst & Young study of 400+ business women business executives, many credit sports with the fostering of key attributes including discipline, leadership, teamwork, and resilience. Similar studies were conducted among women in higher education, corporate and military sectors found similar results with individuals crediting sports with takeaways including confidence building and growth mindsets.

87% NCAA schools offer disproportionately higher rates of athletic opportunities to male athletes compared to their enrollment. Lower participation rates are compounded by pay inequities spanning from athlete pay to coach/leader pay issues. According to a new study, male athletes earn nearly 21x more than their female counterparts, and receive 90% of partnership dollars. This means women athletes are not only seriously underpaid, but also underutilized commercially. As a result, many professional women in sports struggle financially, which disincentivizes future generations from considering sport as a career.

The Path Forward

  • 🔎 Focus on high obesity, low activity regions — East Carroll, Louisiana has both the highest obesity rate in the country (51% of adults obese) and the highest percent of population physically inactive (47% of adults physically inactive). Life expectancy in East Caroll is 71.3, nearly 6 years below the national average. Targeting these high-risk areas has proven to be most effective for improving health outcomes, rather than just focusing on middle-risk or low-risk areas.
  • ⚽️ Develop school youth programs — Early childhood interventions are more likely to create long-term health benefits and engender good behaviors later into adulthood. School youth programs that can teach children about the benefits of physical activity, engage them physically, and even promote healthy eating habits are much more likely to create healthier adults. One of the main objections to increasing the hours of physical activity at school is that it takes time away from classroom learning. However, studies from the CDC found that increasing the hours of school youth exercise programs do not decrease test scores, but in fact increase reading and math scores for elementary school girls. There is strong evidence linking physical activity with improvements in concentration, memory, and classroom behavior.
  • 🛝 Improve our built environments — Majority Black neighborhoods shouldn’t have fewer and smaller parks than majority White neighborhoods. In 2021, The Washington Post published an article titled If Black lives really matter, we must invest in Black neighborhoods. Eugenia South writes, “Clean and accessible parks, trees and micro-green spaces should not be a luxury amenity reserved for those living in affluent, mostly white neighborhoods… Our research has demonstrated that turning vacant land into clean and green space reduces gun crime… Green space has consistently been associated with health benefits.”

Physical activity, sports, and exercise can lead both to longer lives and fewer health complications throughout one’s life. However, low-income communities, black communities, and women are consistently deprived of such opportunities. Our built environments are strong factors influencing this divide, but the choices we make about who gets these resources seems to be the underlying cause. By focusing on low-activity regions and supporting youth before they develop health problems, communities may be able to give strength to those in need.

When Michael Jordan first signed with the Bulls, he included a clause in his contract titled “For the love of the game” which allowed him to play basketball anywhere, anytime, against anyone. We can take a page out of Jordan’s book and give communities this same opportunity to exercise and play whenever we want. This sadly is far from the case, and Jordan was one of the only NBA players in history to ever get such a clause signed.

INTERESTING ON THE WEB

🤖 MIT report on which jobs (and more importantly, roles) are at risk of loss to AI “We find that only 23% of the wages being paid to humans for doing vision tasks would be economically attractive to automate with AI” — TechCrunch

🗺️ New map on where. LGBTQ+ officials are being elected to public office — Georgia/Vermont have roughly the same number as do Florida/New York — Out For America

💡 A proposal for creating a Gross Domestic Distribution (GDD) to add to our reporting of GDP, from one of my favorite professors — American Prospect

Sign up to get exclusive stories like this one to better understand the hidden side of inequality in America — join here: https://americaninequality.substack.com/

--

--

Jeremy Ney
Jeremy Ney

Written by Jeremy Ney

Former Federal Reserve policymaker, currently at Google, now writing about inequality at AmericanInequality.substack.com

Responses (8)